UFOs don't come from another planet

UFO in Manchester

UFOs don't come from another planet

Cacildo Marques – Sao Paulo

      Since Governor John Winthrop, of Massachusetts, wrote accounts of men who saw light objects flying at high speed in January, 1639, the stories of UFO encounters in the Americas have grown.

      These contacts have many points in common, which should be taken into account for the formulation of valid hypotheses to explain the phenomenon.

      The most important fact is that all these UFOs, whether manned or unmanned, take great care not to interfere with the visited environment. Even if the person who sees them has the feeling that might experience a shock, which can be fatal, such a thing never happened. In fact, UFOs do not even need to be careful. They do not really interfere.

      The other common points in the reports are that these objects suddenly stop in the air in a way that no modern human vehicle can do. As soon as they stop, they start at very high speed. They are always very luminous objects. Their shape is cylindrical, oval or saucer-shaped, always rounded, never cubic, what obviously facilitates their rapid locomotion.

      It is necessary to be aware that, although UFOs work with technologies that until now science does not dominate, such as the use of some very advanced form of energy and engineering resources of Taguchi that do not yet apply to the transport of humans, others aspects of the vehicles are compatible with the aerodynamics and displacement that would be expected from flying machines manufactured by the current industry.

      We must also be aware that flight safety has made very little progress since the important contributions of Jerome Fox Lederer in the 1950s - such as the introduction of radio in aircraft cabins - and the reason for this paralysis is the interest of airlines in bragging about the excellence of the current system, mounted on convenient statistics, without the concern of pushing for improvements. All this is the effect of the so-called "installed base". If companies are to demand from the factories equipment with new forms of take-off and landing and new mechanisms for guaranteeing individual safety for passengers, this simple act will denounce an uncertainty that they will not allow to be revealed. This phase, however, will not last for many decades.

      As soon as companies are willing to test new inventions, not only with incremental advances, as it has been since the creation of the jet turbine, but with revolutionary novelties, then we will be facing the future of air transport. We will come to understand how UFOs work and we will stop looking at them as a great mystery.

      Yes, because UFOs do not come from other planets. They are - strictly, will be - manufactured by our industry.

      Will be they? Exactly. Where do UFOs come from? From here, but from future times.

     Given the working hypothesis that they do not come from outside the Earth, there would still be the possibility of a civilization developing outside our radars, perhaps in some underground environments, or at the bottom of some ocean. With all the screening tools we have today scouring without finding anything in these places, the chance of such civilization exists is practically negligible. There remains the journey in time.

      UFOs are vehicles that the humans of the future use to research what is past for them, and also to research their future.

      By the paradox of the grandfather, they cannot interfere in the facts that are already part of the past. One or another person who receives the visit of them can faint of fright, but soon recovers the senses, without keeping sequels. If the person is alone and believes in ETs, he can imagine that he was abducted while this fainting lasts. (Paradox of the grandfather: a traveler who travels to the past and interferes in it can kill his own grandfather, so that the traveler himself cannot exist.)

      Researchers of the future visit our time and also times from a more remote past, gathering and imparting information. Since the seventeenth century, when we were already trying out advanced means of transportation, we came to understand that these vehicles could contain people. Those who saw them in previous centuries saw them as luminous phenomena of nature or as manifestations of the supernatural world.

      UFOs, however, do not come from other planets nor from the world of spirits. They are vehicles used by our fellow researchers a few decades later.

      This is not the case of Galileo's relativity, nor of Poincaré's relativity, but since Einstein's Theory of General Relativity of 1916, the whole study of Mechanics is directed, directly or indirectly, to the possibility of time travel. Just it is necessary to find the passage. Stephen Hawking thought it might be in the wormholes, which connect the folds of spacetime. We do not know yet, but if we do not speculate we will not achieve the feat.

      Time travel, which by current understanding is limited only by the grandfather's paradox, will bring about an unprecedented revolution in human life. In addition to clarifying the historical facts of the past, they will search the future and eliminate, almost completely, the possibilities of epidemics, war conflicts and major accidents, because the uncertainty will be reduced to almost zero. The etiologies will all be unraveled in a short period of time. And, of course, national lotteries, major sporting championships and other chance-based practices will disappear, because they will be obsolete. The great robberies and the great financial deviations will no longer be practiced, because they would be quickly clarified. Democracy, with marked letters or not, will no longer be a game, giving way to more appropriate methods of choice. However, small committee games and small draws will continue to run smoothly, because the vehicles that will lead researchers to the future will not be concerned about them.

      The most alarming conclusion to this, that of the impending time travel, is that in addition to the cure for human diseases, the environment will also be healed, and the Earth will be saved. And how free will will be? It will be where it has always been, without major changes in everyday life.

The cheating of the Social Security Reform in Brazil

The cheating of the Social Security Reform in Brazil

Cacildo Marques - Sao Paulo

     There is a massive and almost complete lack of information within the population about the current laws of Public Pensions in Brazil, which allows permanent manipulation by rulers and the press.

     First of all, there is already retirement by age: 65 for men and 60 for women. In the case of rural workers, one decreases five years in each genre.

     There is also retirement for contribution time: 35 years of contribution, for those over 53 years old, if male, and 30 years, for 48 years old, at least, if a woman.

     The above clarifications, followed by more details, are in the FAQs of the Caixa Economica Federal (CEF) website.

     The most recent reform, adopted in 2015, adds a requirement to prevent early retirements, which is the rule 85-95, which since January 2019 became 86-96, as planned. The meaning of this is that someone only has the right to apply for retirement if, being a man, when adding up the contribution years to the years of age gets a total of at least 96. If the person is a woman, should reach a total of 86.

     The difference of five years between men and women did not come, as it was justified many years later, because of the double female journey, in the employment and at home. It was an invention of Colonel Jarbas Passarinho, who, as a parliamentarian, by voting in the 1980s for reform that created Special Retirement of Teachers, at 25 years of contribution, said he did not agree with such low time for men, and made the project determining 25 years for women and 30 years for men. Since then, the discriminatory idea, aiming protection and discrimination of women was extended to all subsequent social security laws. Today, this special retirement at the 25 years of contribution was swallowed by the minimum age of 60 years for male teachers and 55 years for female teachers, according to the reform that entered into force at the end of 2003.

     The most significant change in this 2003 reform was the establishment of the ceiling for benefit receiving. In current values, the ceiling is at BRL 5,800 per month (US $ 1,555 in February 2019). For a system that until 2003 paid pensions of judges with values ​​of up to BRL 35,000 monthly ($ 9,383), this ceiling now solves the great problem of expenditures with a range of public servants regarded as privileged. It is necessary to remember that the immense mass of retirees receives minimum salary, that currently is of BRL 954 monthly (US $ 256).

     What would cause the pension fund to maintain financial health? Let us see some necessary steps.

First, what is collected from the employee and employer's share, in equal proportion, is not a tax, but a "contribution". Not being a tax, it should not be mixed with national treasury money, but keep in own cash, managed by a federal autarky.

     Second, the value of the employer's quota works as indirect wages, which could never be postponed or denied, which means that the government must never waive (dismiss) any employer to deposit this amount.

     Third, informal jobs, which almost never collect the contribution, should be hard pressed to become formal jobs, and, even when informal, monthly contributions should not be neglected. Large numbers of informal employment or unemployment should not be allowed, so as not to provoke a vacuum in the pension fund.

     Fourth, it is okay to pass money from the social security fund to the national treasury, but this should only be done as loan, to be paid according to the Central Bank's basic interest rate, at least.

     Fifth, any beneficiary whose value received does not derive from his social security contributions, according to the minimum requirements, must have his amounts paid for another type of cash, being part of another type of government account other than the social security authority account. This should be the case with the BCC (Benefit of Continuing Care for the elderly), pensions for family members, etc.

     Sixth, employers with old debts, discounting the failed companies, should be called upon to sign a plan of monthly pensions payment, in order to pay off their debt over a number of years.

     Seventh, companies that do not collect the employer's social security quota must lose the bank credit, until the fulfillment of the obligations.

     Eighth, the employee who requires retirement must "retire" in fact, as soon as the service of his demand is published, being absolutely prohibited from continuing to work in the same company and in the same place, even if disguised as a legal entity.

     Ninth, there must be an annual audit, or at least a biannual one, in December, of all the assets of the social security authority.

     Tenth, there must be a short time for the state and municipal systems to adapt to their constitutions and organic laws the existing laws of federal funds.

     All ten of the above measures are designed to enforce current law, preventing drill holes from leaking social security. There is, therefore, no need for constitutional reform to detract more resources from employers or public servants.

     Why then do they want so much a new reform? Because the sanitation measures listed above are not applied. Contributions are mixed with taxes and social security benefits payments are made with national treasury funds, in clear disregard for the rite of separation of accounts. And as formal employment is gradually disappearing, with acceleration guaranteed by the new labor laws, the contributions of employees and employers, tend to be reduced to an almost negligible amount in relation to the total payments that pensions must make on a monthly basis, both to direct payers of its cash and to beneficiaries with no relation to contributions based on the salary.

     As these problems are not corrected, because one does not intend to do so, one can make a new constitutional reform every four years, with the objective of deceiving foreign investors, that the collapse will continue to increase.

     The dogma bragged by the government that without the social security reform the country returns to recession is talk without nexus, fruit of futurology of reading coffee grounds. None of the reform topics submitted to the National Congress in 2019 is positive for the country. Subtract more resources from wage earners will only reduce national income, what is, now yes, a faster way to return to recession.

Vichy: The Ravenna of the Third Reich

Center of Vichy - France

Vichy: The Ravenna of the Third Reich

Cacildo Marques – Sao Paulo

    The Ravenna Effect is, almost certainly, the most decisive causal relation of Social Psychology to guide the paths of history. It is configured by the shock of years or decades caused by the transfer of the chief of State from his traditional capital to a city without historical secular status of capital, with the ensuing disruption of the services and symbols of stability already built for the conduction of the State, with highlight for the currency. Through the Versailles Effect (Prof. Malcolm H. Wiener), the problem spreads over the countries of the area of influence. The localization of the government does not matter (Bonn Effect), provided that the residence of the chief of State functions effectively in the secular capital (for Germany, it is Berlin).

    Fall. The name Ravenna Effect comes from the set of events that in the fifth century, from the year 402 to the year 476, led to the fall of the Roman Empire. In the year 402, Emperor Honorius transferred the court to Ravenna, leaving the city of Rome to its fate. Since then, frequent wars, uprisings, invasions by other peoples, famine, shortages, epidemics, and many other problems devastated the Italian Peninsula in such a way that when Odoacer, leading his barbarian soldiers, entered Rome, to set up his imperial court, he was received with relief and feast in the streets, by a population that then had great contempt for its distant emperor, Romulus Augustulus.

    Thirteen centuries later, the same mechanism that left the Old Age behind and ushered in the Medieval Age acted to kick-start the Contemporary Age, with the key episode of the French Revolution, which was the Fall of the Bastille on July 14, 1789.

    Versailles. Who played the part of the Ravenna of France at that time was the city of Versailles, where the chief of State Louis XVI resided. After three months, in the heat of the agitation of a rumored protest against the rise of prices, amid rumors that the aristocracy planned deliberately to kill the poor with hunger, there was the Women's March, or October March, in which the Parisian ladies, united with revolutionaries who looted the official weapons depot of Paris, went to Versailles on the evening of October 5 and, after many battles in which a protester was killed and, in response, two guards of the palace had their heads cut off and propped up in stakes, in the afternoon of the October 6 they demanded that Louis XVI was with the protesters to Paris, to settle in the old Tuileries Palace.

    The Ravenna Effect was over, but less than two years later, Louis XVI and his wife Marie-Antoinette fled towards Varennes, when they were intercepted. In a few more months they were sentenced to death in the guillotine.

    Washington. A decade later it began the saga of the Ravenna of the United States, that was its capital Washington. Unlike Ravenna and Versailles, Washington was consolidated, because the citizens of the country had no way of knowing the origin of their misfortunes. Washington was built in 1800 and twelve years later it occurred the Great Anglo-American War, in which English soldiers, attempting to retake the colony, set the city aflame. The Americans rebuilt Washington with a greater commitment than the one shown in 1800, remaking the Capitol, the White House and many other buildings with better designs and in a more reinforced way. In the sixth decade it came the War of Secession, which inside the country is called the American Civil War. It was the greatest civil war in the New World. In the final phase, President Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery and was later murdered, but no one distrusted the Ravenna Effect. And Washington continued its history toward consolidation as a historic capital, which happened with the last capital-newist vicissitude of the country, which was the Great Depression in 1929.

    Tokyo. The time elapsed between the exchange of Rome by Ravenna and the moment of the fall of the empire was 74 years. From the transfer of Louis XIV to Versailles, in 1682, until the withdrawal there of his grandson Louis XVI 107 years passed. The French suffered the cost of the new "capital" for 11 decades. The United States suffered this for 13 decades, lessened by the clever adoption of the gold standard. Japan, which had its capital transferred to Tokyo in 1869, had, 13 decades later, the highest real estate prices in the world, which have declined since then, that is, since the beginning of the 21st century. The problems experienced by Japan in this interval are no secret to anyone, but it is easy to remember, for example, the Sino-Japanese war of 1894 and the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, which received Washington's response nearly four years later with the spill of two atomic bombs.

    Bad. Before this tragic outcome, which was part of the World War II, the world went through World War I, triggered by the attempt of the activist Gavrilo Prinkip against Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, then part of the Autro-Hungarian Empire, which went through a serious problem of dearness. The Ravenna of Emperor Franz Joseph I is not as gaudy as Versailles was in the eighteenth century. It is because he moved in order to stay overnight with his mistress in the city of Bad Itschl, leaving the official capital, Vienna, and Empress Sissi in second plan. Bad Itschl was the most discreet Ravenna in history.

    Weimar. As for the city of Weimar, it did not overthrow an empire, since it was the center of a Republic, which proved to be frustrated, but the superinflation experienced there, leading Germany to an unprecedented impoverishment in the phenomenon called the Weimar Effect (Professor Philip David Cagan), made the Germans search for a mountebank who offered himself as a savior of the homeland, Adolf Hitler, after the problem was already resolved by a descendant of Martin Luther, President Paul von Hindenburg, already installed in the traditional capital, Berlin. The President noted that the voters were being confused, not realizing that Germany was already rerouted, and tried in every way to prevent the rise of the Austrian man, who had been arrested in 1923 for attempted coup. Hindenburg did not succeed because he was taking a solitary fight. On here, a human fault is formed that is explained by the phenomenon of hysteresis: The impulse of the effect ceases, but the effect continues for some more time. In this case of Social Psychology, what occurs is a sensation of hysteresis, not hysteresis itself. The solution is obtained, but popular perception is that everything remains the same. An example of this, there in the same region, was the destruction of Budapest, ordered by Hitler. He died in 1945, but his soldiers proceeded to the destruction of the Hungarian capital in 1946. This is a pure sensation of hysteresis. For those insiders, the Nazism was still in force.

    Hitler, therefore, grew politically along the road opened by Hindenburg. When he died in 1934, Hitler, there was one year as Prime Minister (Chancellor), took his place, through the plebiscite of self-referral, in which he obtained 88% support from the electorate.

    Free from the moorings of the Ravenna Effect represented by Weimar, Germany was growing in the stern. Emma Goldman, a Jewish writer, promoted marches in New York charging the United States government to take action against Hitler, who was chasing Jews. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt despised this demand, because the economic growth of Germany favored much the American companies, among them IBM, or "Big Blue". Hitler feared only one event, as he himself told the advisors at his country house, on the scene shown in the documentary "Swastika": The possible election of Winston Churchill as premier of England.

    Vichy. And what was the Hitler's Ravenna? Now, in obtaining the collaboration of Marshal Philippe Pétain, who agreed to govern France as a province of the Third Reich, Hitler saw no problem in setting up the French government in Vichy. Joan of Arc considered in 1429 that France without Paris did not be France. Pétain ignored it. He did not consider that in the Hundred Years War, after Joan of Arc obtained the coronation of the dauphin as king Charles VII, she demanded him to finance the resumption of Paris, without his giving in to the appeal. She has undertaken on her own day, and was captured in the immediate vicinity of the city. It must be understood that France was in shambles for having its chief of State far from the historical capital. And even with the later retake of the city, the Hundred Years' War left Western Europe broken and unguarded, opening the doors to the materialization of the old dream of the Turks of taking Constantinople, which happened to take place in 1453. There the Medieval Era was closed, and the Modern Age was beginning.

    Pétain and the Nazis saw it as a salutary move to let rebellious Parisians relegated to the basement of history. The new era was with the Vichy Regime, from 1940.

    It was the Ravenna Effect (or Versailles-Weimar Effect) generated from Vichy that showed the French that Nazism - demagogic, uncultivated, racist and authoritarian regime - was a disgrace, something that only 12% of the Germans seemed to agree, by the voting in the plebiscite of the self-referral.

    Resistance grew from France. When the United States, Britain, and the French Resistance decided to disembark to the D-Day on June 6, 1944, they did this in Normandy, French territory, because the initial priority was to free France, a result obtained in the first month of battle. The easiest part for allied troops was to take Paris, because the Parisians, animated by the entry of allies into French territory, had already done the service inside the city, expelling the Nazis.

    Here we have a new aspect of the Ravenna Effect. In addition to this new characteristic, we can call the phenomenon as the Vichy Effect: What the new capital without secular status has to unmask and destroy bad governments that deceive the population when sustaining itself in the demagogy using the developmentalism as a trump. Far from being embarrassed to have harbored the collaborationist government of Pétain, Vichy must be proud to have been the spearhead of the revolt that resulted in the destruction of the Nazi horror.

    History. If we consider, like Popper, that the human story they say to be relevant is the history of tragedies, not that of the great discoveries, artistic creations and great philosophical conceptions, then every truly important episode has the Ravena Effect as its background, even before the fate of the city of Aten, of the father of Tutankhamen, passing through Alexandria, which shortened abruptly, by the early death of the titular, the reign of Alexander, until the recent disaster of the administrative city of Robert Mugabe, Borrowdale Brooks, on the outskirts of Harare, which pushed Zimbabwe to the highest hyperinflation in history in 2008. Earlier, the record was exactly with the Hungarians of 1946, that, having its capital destroyed by the late Nazis, installed the residence of their president in the Lake Balaton.

    Nowadays, following Brazil, Myanmar and Nigeria, the focus of the Ravenna Effect is with Tunisia, whose presidential residence is outside the traditional capital.

Vocabulario terraplanista - flat earther glossary

Vocabulario terraplanista - flat earther glossary

Cacildo Marques - Sao Paulo

    (En política no existe ironía, por lo que todo lo que está aquí es definición pura y simple; si el ciudadano concuerda con las entradas abajo y todavía no es terraplanista, está perdiendo tiempo.)

   Género. Núcleo de la expresión terraplanista "ideología de género", que es la técnica escolar que induce a un niño a cambiar de sexo.
   Socialismo. Un sistema económico del siglo XIX, pero que vigoró en Brasil de 1995 a 2018.
   Socialdemocracia. Nombre fantasía del socialismo reciente, también llamado "marxismo cultural".
   Rifle. Instrumento principal de seguridad individual del ciudadano en sociedades libres.
   Copérnico. Un sacerdote loco que escribió que la Tierra gira alrededor del Sol.
   Newton. Autor de una ley disfuncional (dicen que es de Galileo) llamada "Principio de la inercia".
   Einstein. Un científico loco que intentó corregir Newton, pero escribió una teoría que ni él mismo entendió.
   ONU. Una colusión de naciones propuesta por Einstein en 1945, para implantar el "globalismo".
   Globalismo. Tentativa de imponer una religión universal contraria a la tradición judeocristiana.
   Nacionalismo. Rechazo al globalismo, con ejemplificación aplastante en el Brexit, momento glorioso del Partido Conservador británico.
   Ollavismo. La escuela de pensamiento del mayor filósofo vivo, a quien la academia, por despecho, le negó un diploma.
   Internet. Un espacio de comunicación fruto de la inspiración divina, no de la ciencia moderna, que está toda equivocada.
   Nicotina. Sustancia lícita que hace la alegría de los terraplanistas y no provoca enfisema o cualquier otro mal.
   Partido. Una organización política a la cual ninguna mención debe ser permitida en el aula.
   Correcto. Núcleo de la expresión "políticamente correcto", que es el modo como el ciudadano es políticamente incorrecto.
   Muro. Gran pared que se constituye en una solución inteligente contra andrajosos de países pobres.
   Calentamiento. Núcleo de la expresión "calentamiento global", que es una locura de izquierdistas.
   Cuba. Lugar a donde deben ir los adversarios del terraplanismo.
   Terraplanismo. Las fotografías que muestran la esfericidad de la Tierra son simples manipulaciones.
   Satélite. El satélite artificial es una gran mentira de la NASA, para justificar las teorías erróneas de Newton.
   Maestro. Profesional de enseñanza que necesita ser controlado para no enseñar socialismo y homosexualismo a los niños.
   Reportero. Profesional de prensa especializado en la producción de "fake news".
   Artista. Profesional de diversión que vive de dilapidar el erario público.

The conceptual errors of historical materialism

The conceptual errors of historical materialism

Cacildo Marques – Sao Paulo

    With the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the saga of historical materialism, begun in 1848, fulfilled its cycle. People struggling for the improvement of democracy and the guarantee of social rights are now turning to more current and more advanced theories, in the midst of some late "dreamers" imagining the implantation of "communism" and, on the opposite side, "crazies" organizing an anachronistic hunt for "communists".

    There are seven major theoretical misconceptions of historical materialism since the nineteenth century.

    1) Antimalthusian. Being anti-Malthusian, believing in the infinity of natural resources.

    2) Manichean. Classifying the set of opponents of the cause as "the reaction" (twisted Newton).

    3) Dictatorial. Refusing to revise the proposal of "dictatorship", even after the Parliamentary Republic of 1871.

    4) Refractory. Rejecting Psychology, even after Wilhelm Wundt's laboratory in 1879.

    5) Romantic. In an unconscious return to natural selection, law of the strongest, embracing, with the romantics, the fight against healthy competition.

    6) Confused. Interpreting the millenarian Asian cooperativism as "primitive communism", previous to Christianity.

    7) Scornful. Treating with disdain the previous ("utopian") attempts to improve society.

    It should be noted that both the "communist" and the "anticommunist" dreamers of the twenty-first century bear the same seven defects: They are anti-Malthusian, Manichaean, dictatorial, refractory, romantic, confused, and scornful.

    The vitrine of the so-called "proletarian" dictatorships of the twentieth century, which was the zeal for universal "free" official teaching, did not come from the proposition of historical materialism, but from the incorporation of the education politics from Pombal (1772) and Condorcet (1792).

    The very correctness of the philosophy of historical materialism has been diluted in the inevitable flaws of the model. These include: (a) the idea that politics should not be a game, (b) the abstraction of the religious question, according to the plan of separation of religion and State of the French Revolution, (c) Economy in the organization of society, although not as primeval social fact, (d) the transformation of all wage earners into political agents and (e) the propagation of the conception that the emancipation of wage earners is a world cause.

    All citizens who are struggling for the consolidation of effective democracy, which should not be understood as the regime in which the poor are called to the polls to choose periodically the foremen, but the system that, by periodic and popular choice of representatives, turns its energies towards guaranteeing the continuous improvement of people's living conditions in the areas of Freedom, Environmentalism, Education, Health, Employment, Transport, Security, Supply and Opportunities, all these citizens should study the foundations and trajectory of the life cycle of historical materialism, in order to equip the democratic regime with the necessary fire doors that will prevent new tragic experiences, either for oligarchic purposes or for the so-called magic keys of quick resolution of problems of ordinary citizens.

    No miracle proposal should merit respect if it seeks to undermine the three pillars of democracy, which are (a) the universal periodic vote, (b) the rule of law and (c) the non-longevity of the ruler's term.

Ollavismo: La hegemonía de la incultura

Ollavismo: La hegemonía de la incultura

Cacildo Marques - Sao Paulo

   Los profesores de las Américas han sufrido gran desprecio por parte de gobiernos y clases medias desde hace muchas décadas. Llegó ahora el turno de los artistas e los reporteros unirse a ellos, como víctimas de ataques. Es el resultado del ollavismo.

   Ollavus Querci "no tuvo estudio", como dicen las personas que no recibieron instrucción. Esto no fue obstáculo para que se hiciera pasar por "filósofo", dedicándose a impartir cursos de Filosofía para incautos, teniendo como objetivo central la negación de la ciencia. Esta autoridad para dar cursos él recibió no de alguna facultad, sino del renombre recabado con la venta de libros que él escribió.

   Él no añadió nada útil en sus escritos.

   Se intenta hacer pasar por escéptico, siendo sólo refractario. La actitud escéptica es el comportamiento del científico. Los que dudan de los resultados de la ciencia sin presentar ningún método confiable de refutación son sólo refractarios, nunca escépticos.

   ¿Es necesario leer sus libros para saber que no hay sustancia allí? No, basta con leer uno u otro párrafo clave. Necesitamos leer varios libros de Platón para descubrir alguna asertiva inconsistente. Lo mismo se puede decir de Descartes, Russell o Wittgenstein. De un pseudofilósofo, en la primera media página ya identificaremos varias tonterías. A menos que la persona que lee sea un profesional de Psicología o Psiquiatría dado a hacer análisis de demencias, no hay motivo para que se proceda a la lectura de un libro entero de un individuo de esos.

   Las editoras necesitan vender libros, aún más en estos tiempos de cierres acelerados de librerías. El estándar exigido por ellas dentro de los textos presentados son un mínimo de corrección gramatical. Este no es un gran problema, una vez que los procesadores de texto ya se encargan de corregir el artículo más denunciador del trabajo de un mal escritor, que es la ortografía. Los programas se arriesgan a corregir también los errores más evidentes de concordancia, sea verbal, sea nominal. ¡Listo! ¡El "filósofo" de baja instrucción está redimido!

   Los problemas de sintaxis, semántica, puntuación y conjugación son fácilmente dominados por el mal escritor, por puro mimetismo. Si él quiere decir una cosa y, por incongruencia de escritura, dice otra, eso no comprometerá el raciocinio, pues lo que no tiene remedio, como reza el dicho popular, "remediado está". Si el raciocinio presentado en el texto es insano, errores de sintaxis o semántica serán absorbidos, ya que no hay un sentido legítimo en la escritura. Incluso los errores comunes de aplicación de reglaje pronominal entran en esa categoría. Cada lector entienda lo que quiera.

   De cualquier modo, el psiquiatra que se dé al trabajo de estudiar el caso tendrá que leer y releer con atención cada párrafo, pues la construcción del texto obedece a la intención de despistar, de desviar al lector de los conocimientos que él ya detenga. Se trata de construir una nueva cultura, la cultura de la incultura.

   Si la ciencia estadística permite mostrar que el tabaquismo es responsable de graves enfermedades, él "argumenta" desmereciendo la estadística. La opinión de él, según la cual el tabaco no hace ningún mal, está por encima de cualquier estadística que los científicos puedan utilizar. Eso es lo que él piensa y propaga.

   Todos los que no aceptan sus argumentos son puestos en las categorías de "burros", "imbéciles" y "izquierdistas". No se piense que la divergencia se limita a Aristóteles, Kant o Nietzsche. Los que creyeron en la Mecánica de Newton siempre estuvieron engañados, porque, según él, ella se basa en principios contradictorios y absurdos.

   En la condición de escritor lucrativo, él publicó en el Jornal do Brasil de 15 de junio de 2006 un texto titulado "En los orígenes de la estupidez occidental". Lo que está en esos orígenes, dice, es un error que Newton cometió en la primera de sus tres leyes de la Dinámica, la Ley de la Inercia.

   La tontería comienza en el primer párrafo, cuando acusa a Newton de ser autor de una ley equivocada que nunca fue (él no lo sabe) de autoría de Newton. Nosotros decimos "las tres leyes de Newton" para facilitar la referencia, porque Newton de hecho usó tres principios sobre los que basó la Dinámica, adoptando como el primero de ellos el Principio de la Inercia, de Galileo Galilei.

   Sí, él, por ignorancia, acusa a Newton de un "crimen" que fue cometido por Galileo. Razón? No tuvo clases de Física (si por casualidad tuvo, y prestó atención, o no entendió nada o el profesor fue incompetente).

   El profesor de la Enseñanza Media, de hecho, no tiene obligación de contar que la primera Ley de Newton es de Galileo. Pero el primer párrafo del artículo de Ollavus Querci no revela sólo esa ignorancia. Allí, en esas tres líneas, comete otra estulticia muchísimo más grave que la de acusar a Newton por una "falla" de Galileo. ¿Es posible eso? ¿Es posible en tres líneas cometer un error histórico de autoría y aún escribir una tontería más flagrante?

   Sí. Como él no entendió nada de lo que leyó sobre las tres leyes de la dinámica, él "interpretó" la primera ley, la Ley de la Inercia, como siendo compuesta por dos principios, el principio de la inercia y el principio "del movimiento eterno". ¿Qué locura es esa de "movimiento eterno"? Es el modo como él crea "conceptos", con el objetivo de engañar al lector desavisado. No pudo entender que la Ley de la inercia es el principio mismo de la inercia. El tal del "movimiento eterno" es sólo uno de los dos aspectos en que la inercia se presenta. Se trata de una de las formas en que se presenta la "relatividad de Galileo". El "movimiento eterno" es lo que los profesores y los libros de texto llaman "velocidad constante". En la visión de Newton, un cuerpo material está en reposo o en constante movimiento (que interpretamos como "a velocidad constante"). Si el lector está acoplado al cuerpo, como, por ejemplo, dentro de un coche a velocidad constante, sin mirar hacia fuera, el lector mira al suelo del coche y ve que está en reposo. Si mira ahora a los árboles a los márgenes del camino, verá que el suelo del coche está a velocidad constante. Para Galileo, estar a velocidad constante o estar en reposo es cosa que depende sólo del referencial, es decir, del punto de referencia. De un modo o de otro, mirando al suelo o mirando a los árboles, el pasajero en el carro está en un sistema que obedece al Principio de la Inercia. Si el conductor acelera el coche, vamos a la segunda Ley de Newton, que garantiza que la fuerza aplicada se iguala al producto de la masa por la aceleración del cuerpo, incluyendo aquí resistencia del aire, fricción y cualquier otro elemento de interferencia. La tercera ley, como se sabe, es el Principio de Acción y Reacción.

   Él, sin embargo, ve la primera Ley de Newton como una "absurdidad ostensiva", pues, si estiramos "indefinidamente los límites del tiempo", no habrá diferencia "entre el cambio y la permanencia". Con ello él concluye que el "movimiento eterno es concepto autocontraditorio".

  La primera Ley de Newton habla sólo de un Principio, el de la inercia, y no de dos, que según Ollavus Querci son la inercia y el "movimiento eterno". Él "interpreta" que estos dos principios que componen la primera Ley son contradictorios entre sí, por lo que "descubre que la primera ley está equivocada. Y, en párrafos más abajo, se admira que en tres siglos los estudiosos no hayan percibido la "contradicción", que él en realidad lo vio. Y dice que Leibniz y Einstein hablaban respetuosamente de Newton, pero que tiene "la impresión" que por dentro se reían del viejo, es decir, se burlaban de Newton. Si nadie antes había percibido las fallas, ¿por qué se burlar del inglés? El texto no explica, porque el objetivo es engañar a las víctimas del mal sistema educativo. Pero no sólo Leibniz, el mayor de los socios científicos de Newton, y Einstein, su continuador, se burlaban del anciano. Según Ollavus Querci, también Goethe lo hacía. Lo que él está confesando es que tiene "la impresión" que Goethe era un escritor de la misma cepa que él, Ollavus Querci, aunque no tuvo el coraje de explicitar su desprecio por las Leyes de Newton.

   Argumentos y más argumentos, "pruebas" y más "pruebas" contra el trabajo de los científicos, éste es el universo comercial de Ollavus Querci. Y no se trata de deshonestidad, pero de trastorno psíquico. Él sería deshonesto si hubiera conocido, y asimilado, el teorema de Alfred Tarski, según el cual todo discurso en lenguaje no algebraica encierra contradicción. Intentar probar fallas en los resultados de Galileo y Newton sin usar las ecuaciones, pero sólo lanzando mano de palabrería persuasiva, sólo no es algo totalmente desproporcionado porque rinde mucho dinero, succionado de la buena fe de las personas poco instruidas.

   Cuestionando la ciencia de modo anticientífico, Ollavus Querci crea una inmensa corriente de refractarios dispuestos a combatir el trabajo de profesores, artistas y reporteros. Ellos dicen que lo que la ciencia dice no tiene valor, y usan como medio de divulgación los más sofisticados productos de la ciencia, que son las computadoras, la Internet, los satélites de comunicación, la Mecánica Cuántica y así sucesivamente. A través de estos medios se burlan de los científicos que advierten sobre el calentamiento global, que alertan sobre los resultados desastrosos de la deforestación, que defienden la enseñanza pública y la investigación, que desarrollan y aplican vacunas, que trabajan bajo los parámetros de la Teoría de la Evolución, que hacen avanzar la Macroeconomía, que se dedican a profundizar la Psicología.

   Desde que los teléfonos inteligentes llegaron a manos de la gran masa, entre 2008 y 2015, nuevos políticos y nuevos "filósofos" descubrieron un gran caudal de autopromoción, que es esa táctica de comunicarse directamente a través de vídeos con el público en general. Este público, el video-espectador, pasó a juzgar que ya no necesita orientación de líderes preparados y de intelectuales graduados, como ocurría desde los tiempos de Hammurabi. Sin casi ninguna lectura, la masa "ve" los vídeos de sus nuevos ídolos, con adoctrinamiento belicoso contra los letrados tradicionales, y ejerce su poder de elección a partir de esos accesos. Es el nuevo mundo de la incultura, ambiente paradisíaco para Ollavus Querci y todos los pseudofilósofos de la actualidad. Este nuevo modus vivendi ya ha elegido gobiernos en varios países, siempre llevando la bandera del rechazo a la intelectualidad académica, lo que incluye rechazar a (a) la Inmigración, (b) la ONU, (c) el Acuerdo del Clima, (d) la Socialdemocracia y (e) la Globalización. La universidad, el periódico, la televisión, la biblioteca y el teatro todavía no saben cómo situarse en esa realidad.

   Ollavus Querci cambiaría totalmente su línea programática de actuación si tuviera estructura instruccional mínima para entender el papel de Isaac Newton en la modernidad tecnológica que él y sus seguidores usan como si fuera un regalo de algún mago. Él no tiene como entender que los satélites de comunicación están ahí transmitiendo su arsenal de locuras porque fueron construidos y lanzados según las ecuaciones de Newton para las leyes de la Gravitación. Sí, Newton, el viejo que él cree que servía de chacota a Leibniz, Goethe y Einstein, no sólo estudió la Gravitación, pero a partir de ella creó las ecuaciones para los satélites artificiales. No sabe que otros grandes científicos de la historia, de Al-Khwarizmi y Al-Hazen a Giuseppe Peano, Grace Murray Hoper, Richard Feynman y Andrew Wiles, están detrás de las ecuaciones y funciones que permiten que los datos y las imágenes alcancen a la pantalla de la computadora portátil que utiliza. Sin esas ecuaciones de Newton, los satélites caerían sobre la cabeza de Ollavus Querci y sobre su colección de rifles, allá en su sitio de Richmond, la efímera capital de los Confederados, que desencadenaron la Guerra de Secesión por no aceptar la entonces inminente liberación de los esclavos.

The 5 neo-Nazi bombs on the networks

The 5 neo-Nazi bombs on the networks

Cacildo Marques - Sao Paulo

   The enemy of social networking companies is not the lie nor the scandal with the denunciation of storing customer data. The enemy is the establishing of the strategy of using networks as a platform for neo-Nazi indoctrination, to win elections and command large areas and populations. In the twentieth century email services had already made the decision to censor content of explicit Nazi campaign and outreach of paederoticism (commonly called "pedophilia"). In the political field, the neo-Nazis broke up the siege by reneging on the swastika and disguising their admiration for Mussolini and Hitler. It is not a central part of the effort to build "clubs" for flatearthist, climate refractories or victims of conspiratorial theories, if not as a way of joining ignorant or crazy persons. Also the question of sexual morality is used only as a backdrop, as all hypocrites have done since antiquity. If it was difficult to make a decision to censor these two dangers, swastika and pedophilia, the more difficult it is to veto the five foci of neo-Nazi action, but Internet portals will work against democracy, and against freedom, if they do not proceed to this censorship, because the work of the neo-Nazis today is to dominate the social networks, mainly through videos, to convince those who read little, with the five types of bombs below.

     1) Militarism. Use of military and belicist symbols in political parties, with apology for war and armamentism.
     2) Punitivism. Defense of proposals to reduce the age of criminal liability and to harden punishments.
     3) Fanaticism. Mix of divinity and religiosity with political parties (theocracy).
     4) Racism. Apology of "racial" supremacy and campaigns against immigrants who are poor or come from poor regions.
     5) McCarthyism. Preaching of extemporaneous McCarthyism, with attempts of gags to teachers, artists and reporters.